Data Security + Data Surveillance = More Data Business

Data Security + Data Surveillance = More Data Business

By
November 3, 2015

In today’s fast paced business environment, risk is everywhere and data security is rapidly changing. However, few things remain unchanged: hackers will create more sophisticated scripts to get around your security fortresses trying to steal your identity, money, and corporate secrets while security software developers will improve their defense systems to counter those concerns. In the last several years however, we have been dealing with a completely new type of data privacy violation that pushes the boundaries of the software industry and introduces a geopolitical aspect to data security. With ‘Edward Snowden’s’ disclosures of widespread US spying on its own citizens, a big bad wolf of mass surveillance has emerged making good old firewalls look like children’s toys. Data privacy has been pushed to the level of international politics and concerns are rising towards the tangible negative effects of US government’s surveillance efforts.

 

Prior to loss of the public’s naiveté, the general expectation was that data can be shared only with authorization of the entity producing this data. Apparently the US National Security Agency (NSA) had another opinion and pursued execution of their goals and objectives with little regard given to what was perceived to be information privacy. Indeed, if there is no law defining these boundaries, why not? Mass surveillance practices have been in place for at least a decade unknown to the general public. Moreover, these practices have encouraged development of very sophisticated spying technology. It has been reported that this technology is being built into software, hardware, and electronic appliances which we are buying, renting and using in the public domain. How much of this is true is not for this particular discussion. For now, let’s just look at the reaction from the governments of other countries.

Following the Snowden disclosure in 2013, the EU demanded changes to the Safe Harbor agreement which allowed businesses to move data generated by Europeans to servers in the US. Ever since then, the EU and the US have been negotiating updates on it. In October 2015, the European Court of Justice invalidated this agreement and ruled that Europeans’ data was insufficiently protected from national intelligence services when transferred to the US. Following the ruling, the EU and the US got into the negotiations about the power given to the national data protection authorities to independently review and suspend data transfers to the US. On October 26, 2015, the EU announced that it had agreed in principle with the US on a new trans-Atlantic data-transfer pact; however European officials are still looking for clear conditions on how to ensure that these commitments are binding enough to meet the court’s requirements and limits to the extent to which the US intelligence services have access to European personal data.

Acceptance of the new pact is not that smooth throughout the EU. Germany, being the most vocal among other state members about the issue, has had multiple run ins with the US authorities over information monitoring, and the newly released Court decision failed to make Germany’s federal and regional data-protection authorities any happier: they stated they wouldn’t approve any new transfers of data to the US. Opponents to such a hard line German position argue that data transfers are crucial to carrying out daily business operations and limiting such transfers would cause market volatility.

Let’s sum it up. The world finds out the US intelligence has been collecting information on all citizens and businesses that entered the US legal space, or businesses touching the interest of national security. Some take it as “good job, thank you for protecting us”. Others are not so joyful about it finding violation of their personal and business privacy unacceptable and contradictory to basic legal rights. Then some countries start a legal fight against these practices. The discovery of the NSA sticking their nose in other countries’ businesses on the premise of national security put relationships between these countries and the US under severe stress. In addition, the negotiations related to the US-EU data-transfer pact created a breach between Germany and more tolerant EU member states. Now we have international tension, loss of trust, and a completely new legal framework. Yet being in embryonic state, this framework has all signs of transforming a self-regulating platform into a completely new global business sector with its law, regulators, service providers, and an oversight system backed up by enforcement, including sanctions.

Skeptics do not expect the NSA stepping too far from its main premise of safeguarding the interests of national security by continuing on its course of global spying. As an outcome, we enjoy the emergence of more services stretching from new Apps promising to protect us from electronic spying, whether it is government, malicious or just curious hackers to off-grid data storage solutions. As a middle ground between them, there are dedicated data storage solutions, which guarantee that your data is not “out there somewhere in the cloud”, but instead is on private servers. And there is another specialty that is getting more traction: cryptography. The development of “cryptosystems” that include elements that render data undecipherable should not fall into the wrong hands is becoming a serious business.

Post a Comment


Next
Next

More Articles on Editorial

Data Smartens up in a Fog

Those who are part of the data management game can juggle terms like Hadoop, NoSQL, and RDBMS freely. However, for those who are not in the game, this lingo will likely carry the same meaning as a proclamation of goodwill ... Read more »

The Year-end Review and Future Projections: Awaiting More Synergy between the Energy Sector and IT

Lacking originality, we are closing 2015 with the yearly review and endeavored predictions of the near future; this time however, we will look at the energy sector in conjunction with data business and software solutions. The energy sector has been ... Read more »

August, the Month of Energy Sector Discontent

The eighth month of the year has historically been very special for the US energy sector. The Northeast Blackout of 2003, the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005, and the Clean Power Plan and Methane Emission Reduction Policy proposal of ... Read more »

Natural Gas Coasts Along, while Other Energy Markets Test Rollercoasters

I do not recall more confusion and misalignment in the energy sector as is happening now. Any correlation and interdependency that existed previously among oil, coal, natural gas, and electricity markets seem to have evaporated; a multiplicity of independent events ... Read more »

Intermittent Success in the Battle between Coal and Renewables

On June 29, 2015, industry newsmakers announced “a blow” to President Obama’s environmental plan. On that day, the US Supreme Court overturned the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) limiting mercury and other hazardous air pollutants ... Read more »

Tesla’s Off-grid Power Storage Batteries: More Questions on Load Forecasting and Data

Tesla’s announcement last month of new energy storage batteries was positioned to mark a major milestone on the road towards a clean and sustainable future. Storage that is on the end-user’s side is being viewed, at least by some, as ... Read more »

Crude Oil Transportation by Rail: More than the Industry Bargained For?

An announcement by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) about the new set of oil statistics missed the spotlight. Really, what’s so special about adding another data report that only expands on the list of transportation options for the same ... Read more »

Nasdaq Adds to the Energy Derivatives Markets and Steps in against CME and ICE

I admire the valor of Nasdaq – daring to enter the energy derivatives market space that has been dominated by two giants, CME and ICE. Nasdaq, operating mainly in stock markets, though with some exposure to European power markets, decided ... Read more »

Data Sources: NASDAQ OMX

The Emerging Power Markets’ New Player – the Microgrid Operator

The concept of microgrids is gaining momentum; their share in the energy space is growing. The microgrid is not a novel concept, as in most remote communities self-containment is the only feasible approach to power supply. For many years, localities without ... Read more »

State of the Union Address: Dominating the World Energy Markets and Losing to Congress

The State of the Union Address, the speech delivered by the US President at a joint session of the US Congress, is the most highly anticipated public announcement of the year for many industries, including energy. But the state of ... Read more »

 

Page 1 of 512345